meta name="description" content="US Supreme Court Decision Hamdan vs Rumsfield"> Marc Schulman

 


CSS Menu Style Css3Menu.com

Custom Search
 

Hamdan vs Rumsfeld

The Supreme Court rejected the position of the Bush Administration that they can hold terrorist without due process and and without the protection of the Geneva Accords. The court in a 5-3 ruling stated that detainees at Guatanimo Bay were entitled to be tried either under the rules of a military trail or other rules that approved by Congress but not by rules unilaterly set up by the executive branch. The ruling also stated that the Geneva Accords on prisoners apply to terrorist as well. The ruling was the most extensive rejections of Presidential power in a generation. The Bush administration in the wake of 9/11 oversaw one the largest increases in presidential powers in generations. The decision in the Hamdan case indicated that the Supreme Court did not accept the underlying basis of the Bush Administrations actions- that the executive branch in a time of war could set its own rules. Text of Decision